Changes

What might we call this site?

What might we call this site?

: Criticism of Crowdsourcing

* Criticism of Crowdsourcing

: Wrongs of the Internet

* Wrongs of the Internet

: Rethinking Free Culture

* Rethinking Free Culture

: Wikipedia Analysis (attn: the term "Wikipedia" is trademarked.  Can we use this name? ) or WikiAnalysis

* Wikipedia Analysis (attn: the term "Wikipedia" is trademarked.  Can we use this name?) or WikiAnalysis

: WikiReader (Americans will remember the "Weekly Reader" from Grade school … although this might not work for an international audience)

* WikiReader (Americans will remember the "Weekly Reader" from Grade school … although this might not work for an international audience)

: Center for Internet Criticism

* Center for Internet Criticism

: Internet Ethics Report

* Internet Ethics Report

: Internet Concerns

* Internet Concerns

: The Folly of Crowds

* The Folly of Crowds

: CyberCulture Review

* CyberCulture Review

: Leaving Pseudopia

* Leaving Pseudopia

: blows against the e-pyre

* blows against the e-pyre

One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral.  A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject.  It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.

One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral.  A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject.  It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.