12,080
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday November 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchCriticism of crowdsourcing (view source)
Revision as of 19:36, 18 October 2008
, 19:36, 18 October 2008→Name ideas
: The Folly of Crowds
: The Folly of Crowds
: CyberCulture Review
: CyberCulture Review
: Blows Against The E-Pyre
: Leaving Pseudopia
: blows against the e-pyre
One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral. A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject. It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.
One of the reasons that "The Wikipedia Review" has been so successful as a concept is that the name is precise, yet neutral. A successful name will most likely have a neutral, objective(perhaps scientific), element which will not necessarily be seen as being negative towards the subject. It is perhaps more effective to try to remain objective in our criticism, as to let the objective evidence speak for itself.
