Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
→‎If we put aside political correctness, concerning Korcula's history: Korčula history - there needs to be an historical reassessment.
Line 27: Line 27:  
It is difficult to determine the exact history from 476 - 999 (even from 1000 -1250) because the sources are very scarce (people can easily spin any historic theme). It has been written many, many times that they, the Croatians, settled on Korčula and assimilated the remains of the Romans and quickly and firmly spread the Croatian language. This interpretation of history in modern times is a heavily politically driven and defined within a political context and agenda, perspectives of the Pan-Slavism and Nationalistic movements.
 
It is difficult to determine the exact history from 476 - 999 (even from 1000 -1250) because the sources are very scarce (people can easily spin any historic theme). It has been written many, many times that they, the Croatians, settled on Korčula and assimilated the remains of the Romans and quickly and firmly spread the Croatian language. This interpretation of history in modern times is a heavily politically driven and defined within a political context and agenda, perspectives of the Pan-Slavism and Nationalistic movements.
   −
For example 'The Statute of Korčula' was drafted in 1214 (Liber Legum Statutorum Curzola 1214), and most likely the first one was written by the Korčula Latins (not Slavs).
+
For example 'The Statute of Korčula' was drafted in 1214 (Liber Legum Statutorum Curzola 1214), and most likely the first one was written by the Korčula Latins (not Slavs).
 +
 
 +
Korčula history - there needs to be an historical reassessment.
    
== Korcula in the Context of Old Roman Cities of Dalmatia ==
 
== Korcula in the Context of Old Roman Cities of Dalmatia ==
7,909

edits

Navigation menu