3,699
edits
Changes
→Overall "Standards & Rules"
: I think the for-profit infobox_company works equally well for either public or private firms. There's only a few major sections that need data elements - public information is merely a subset within certain sections. All one needs to do for private firm is eliminate unnecessary data references within those respective sections.--[[User:Centiare|Centiare]] 14:05, 15 November 2006 (PST)
: I think the for-profit infobox_company works equally well for either public or private firms. There's only a few major sections that need data elements - public information is merely a subset within certain sections. All one needs to do for private firm is eliminate unnecessary data references within those respective sections.--[[User:Centiare|Centiare]] 14:05, 15 November 2006 (PST)
:: In terms of other info_boxes, the sky really is the limit. As I indicated to you, the Directory potential is much greater than just operating enterprises and/or individuals. For example, with the semantic tagging components, there's nothing stopping anyone from creating a Lexis/Nexis facility, or any other type of database application.
:: That being said, it would be quite exhausting to try and create every type of infobox one might conceivably need. I'd rather try and harness the wiki open collaboration model to encourage others to help design & publish infoboxes. They should be subject to the same review stds as WP before they are release to the general public. --[[User:Centiare|Centiare]] 14:18, 15 November 2006 (PST)
And I think we need to devise '''Rules of Style''' for:
And I think we need to devise '''Rules of Style''' for: