Changes

Line 131: Line 131:  
Philippe Beaudette's two-step cowardly response:
 
Philippe Beaudette's two-step cowardly response:
   −
::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thekohser2 17:40, 20 January 2010] Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">blocked</font color="red">'''}} Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked)  
+
::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thekohser2 17:40, 20 January 2010] Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) '''<font color="red">blocked</font color="red">''' Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked)  
 
<br>
 
<br>
::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&lqt_method=talkpage_history#Background_report_2970 18:03, 20 January 2010]    Critics? Which one(s)?    Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs)    {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">Deleted</font color="red">'''}}     (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))
+
::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&lqt_method=talkpage_history#Background_report_2970 18:03, 20 January 2010]    Critics? Which one(s)?    Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs)    '''<font color="red">Deleted</font color="red">'''    (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation's ''Strategic Planning'' group is an offense that draws censorship and blocking as the only form of response?
 
Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation's ''Strategic Planning'' group is an offense that draws censorship and blocking as the only form of response?