Changes

===Gwen Gale is dishonest and untruthful===

===Gwen Gale is dishonest and untruthful===

I have discussed above how Gwen Was making untruthful statements in her RfA,how she failed disclosing a sock account "The Witch" she used in her introductory statement for arbcom election. Here's another striking example of dishonesty and untruthfulness demonstrated by the user:

===Gwen Gale is dishonest and untruthful===

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Gwen_Gale Gwen Gale mentioned her "Wyss" account in her statement], when she unsuccessfully tried to get elected to ArbCom, but if one was to click on it, he was directed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wyss to Gwen Gale] page. Nowhere in her statement she ever mentioned she was blocked and topic banned while editing as Wyss.  

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive5#Your_Block_on_User:Southerndata This thread is about yet another bad block imposed by Gwen Gale]. She blocked this user while involved  with him (edit warring on the same article), but see what she is saying:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive5#Your_Block_on_User:Southerndata "It was straightforward blanking but after the block, I edited the article and given this, was not happy with having been the blocking admin. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)"]. "'''After''' the block", Gwen? Well let's see. The user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3ASoutherndata&type=block was blocked at 15:04, 28 June 2008] for so called  "vandalism" at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Noonan Fred Noonan]. Gwen Gale edited this article a lot, for example on June 26,2008 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&limit=500&action=history she made at least 10 edits]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&oldid=2399161 Actually Gwen Gale wrote this article, when she still edited as Wyss], but let's see June 28,2008: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&action=historysubmit&diff=222286333&oldid=222286201 Gwen Gale] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&action=historysubmit&diff=222287525&oldid=222287133 was edit warring] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&action=historysubmit&diff=222288253&oldid=222288170 with the very same editor she later blocked]. She was editing the article not '''after''' the block, but '''before''' the block.

And of course after blocking the user while so heavily involved with him Gwen Gale [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3ASoutherndata&type=block blocked him again] just two days later on 22:38, 30 June 2008 in spite of being [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive5#Your_Block_on_User:Southerndata "not happy with having been the blocking admin".]

*Gwen Gale failed to disclose "The Witch" account in her RfA. After she was specifically asked about this account, she made a untruthful statement:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gwen_Gale#Questions_from_BusterD "For about 24 hours, two years ago, yes. I quickly decided User:The Witch was an unhelpful username so I went back to User:Wyss. You will please note the account wasn't used to evade the arbcom ruling. I don't consider this brief experiment relevant but I'll be happy to answer questions about it."] Actually Gwen Gale did evade "the arbcom ruling" . There are hard '''on-wiki''' evidences she evaded her ban on a few occasions. I am not providing them here in order not to be accused in outting, but I will email the evidences to any interested authorized user. Also "The Witch" made her [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Depictions_of_lesbian_sex_in_pornography&diff=prev&oldid=31830636 first (not deleted edit)] on December 18, 2005, and  her [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=5th_Duke_of_Cleveland_hoax&diff=prev&oldid=35817314 last (not deleted edit)] on January 19,2006. So, no, Gwen, your "expirement" lasted mach longer than "about 24 hours". Later on Gwen Gale [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwen_Gale/archive9#User:The_Witch repeated her untruthful statement once again "I tried that name out for a day, three years ago."]

To sum the above, not only Gwen called "vandalism" what was not "vandalism", not only she blocked the user while involved with him big, but she also made an untruthful statement that she edited the article '''after''' she imposed the block.

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008/Vote/Gwen_Gale Gwen Gale failed to mention her "The Witch" account in her statement], when she unsuccessfully tried to get elected to ArbCom.

 

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Noonan&action=historysubmit&diff=222287525&oldid=222287133 Here's an example of Gwen Gale reverting a clearly good faith edit claiming it was "vandalism"]. In an apparent try to cover up she blocked the editor for edit warring with herself, she also claimed "vandalism" in the edit summary for that block.

===Recent misuse of administrative tools===

===Recent misuse of administrative tools===