Changes

A "witchy" girl Heidi Wyss became the Wikipedia's witch, when she became [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators wikipedia administrator] Gwen Gale.

A "witchy" girl Heidi Wyss became the Wikipedia's witch, when she became [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators wikipedia administrator] Gwen Gale.

One of the biggest problems with Wyss is that she always has been treating herself differently than others. Probably one of the most striking examples of such behavior is a story about Wyss writing two articles on wikipedia about herself:[http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/1431/89587859ig5.jpg Heidi Wyss] and [http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/6083/92979875oe7.jpg Gormglaith (novel)]. One problem with that is that Wyss's notability is way below wikipedia's standards for inclusion (she wrote a single one to read novel that is available absolutely free of charge on the NET.) Another problem is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest conflict of interest]: for example a person writing about herself could be not neutral. As it is seen from her contributions Wyss was well aware about these policies. She was very active [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&offset=20041205181219&limit=500&target=Wyss in voting on deletion requests of articles written by others],often claiming that a subject of an article is not notable: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Valby&diff=prev&oldid=8288404 "*'''Delete'''. Ad, vanity, and doing off-colour versions of covers isn't notable."] (the article was kept);[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russell_White&diff=prev&oldid=8153396 *'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 18:08, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)] (the article was kept).  

One of the biggest problems with Wyss is that she always has been treating herself differently than others, violating the Golden Rule: "One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself." Probably one of the most striking examples of such behavior is a story about Wyss writing two articles on wikipedia about herself:[http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/1431/89587859ig5.jpg Heidi Wyss] and [http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/6083/92979875oe7.jpg Gormglaith (novel)]. One problem with that is that Wyss's notability is way below wikipedia's standards for inclusion (she wrote a single one to read novel that is available absolutely free of charge on the NET.) Another problem is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest conflict of interest]: for example a person writing about herself could be not neutral. As it is seen from her contributions Wyss was well aware about these policies. She was very active [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&offset=20041205181219&limit=500&target=Wyss in voting on deletion requests of articles written by others],often claiming that a subject of an article is not notable: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Valby&diff=prev&oldid=8288404 "*'''Delete'''. Ad, vanity, and doing off-colour versions of covers isn't notable."] (the article was kept);[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russell_White&diff=prev&oldid=8153396 *'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 18:08, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)] (the article was kept).  

Then she herself [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29 nominated an article for deletion]. She wrote:

Then she herself [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leo_J._Meyer_%282nd_nomination%29 nominated an article for deletion]. She wrote: