Changes

===Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone===

===Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone===

Most evidences against Wyss [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Evidence presented at this page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Workshop at this page] were removed either by herself, when she became an administrator, or by another administrators. For example one of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FWilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone%2FWorkshop&action=historysubmit&diff=31671855&oldid=30963842 the evidences] was:

Most evidences against Wyss [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Evidence presented at this page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Workshop at this page] were removed either by herself, when she became an administrator, or by another administrators. For example one of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FWilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone%2FWorkshop&action=historysubmit&diff=31671855&oldid=30963842 the evidences] was:

{{cquote|Wyss is still showing a lack of insight. On 16 December 2005, he/she says on his/her talk page: "Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards." See [63]. Onefortyone 23:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)}} but if one is to click on the link with the number 63, one will get [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wyss&diff=31560139&oldid=31558060 a page that states: "The relevant page of the wiki was "User:Wyss" and the requested data (for error checking purposes) was: (Diff: 31558060, 31560139)"]. Such deleting of the talk page history violates basic Wikipedia policies. As it is seen from her contributions Wyss was well aware about these policies. She was very active [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&offset=20041205181219&limit=500&target=Wyss in voting on deletion requests of articles written by others],often claiming that a subject of an article is not notable: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Valby&diff=prev&oldid=8288404 "*'''Delete'''. Ad, vanity, and doing off-colour versions of covers isn't notable."] (the article was kept);[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russell_White&diff=prev&oldid=8153396 *'''Delete''' not notable [[User:Wyss|Wyss]] 18:08, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)] (the article was kept).

{{cquote|Wyss is still showing a lack of insight. On 16 December 2005, he/she says on his/her talk page: "Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards." See [63]. Onefortyone 23:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)}} but if one is to click on the link with the number 63, one will get [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wyss&diff=31560139&oldid=31558060 a page that states: "The relevant page of the wiki was "User:Wyss" and the requested data (for error checking purposes) was: (Diff: 31558060, 31560139)"]. Such deleting of the talk page history violates basic Wikipedia policies.

===Wyss expresses her opinion on wikipedia and wikipedians===

===Wyss expresses her opinion on wikipedia and wikipedians===