Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| ==Work Area 1== | | ==Work Area 1== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | ===3.2. Reflective Inquiry=== |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | |
− | Inquiry Driven Systems
| + | ====3.2.1. Integrity and Unity of Inquiry==== |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 1
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 3.2.1. Integrity and Unity of Inquiry | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| One of the very first questions that one encounters in | | One of the very first questions that one encounters in |
| the inquiry into inquiry is one that challenges both the | | the inquiry into inquiry is one that challenges both the |
Line 45: |
Line 37: |
| of mildly tweaking the same old tunes and draping new materials | | of mildly tweaking the same old tunes and draping new materials |
| on the same old forms? | | on the same old forms? |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 2
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.1. Integrity and Unity of Inquiry (concl.)
| |
| | | |
| If one reflects, shares the opinion, or takes the point of view | | If one reflects, shares the opinion, or takes the point of view |
Line 90: |
Line 74: |
| to this matter to such a degree that it is never interchangeable | | to this matter to such a degree that it is never interchangeable |
| with the forms that are proper to other modes of inquiry. | | with the forms that are proper to other modes of inquiry. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations==== |
− | | |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 3
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Next I consider the preparations for a phenomenology. | | Next I consider the preparations for a phenomenology. |
| This is not yet any style of phenomenology itself but | | This is not yet any style of phenomenology itself but |
Line 146: |
Line 126: |
| This dimension of existential import is one that enjoys a considerable | | This dimension of existential import is one that enjoys a considerable |
| development in the sequel. | | development in the sequel. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 4
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| If one asks what apparitions and allegations have in common, it seems to be | | If one asks what apparitions and allegations have in common, it seems to be |
Line 193: |
Line 165: |
| for treating them as true, or a foundation that is capable of lending | | for treating them as true, or a foundation that is capable of lending |
| support to their prima facie evidence. | | support to their prima facie evidence. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 5
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| Once the dimension of existential import is recognized as a parameter | | Once the dimension of existential import is recognized as a parameter |
Line 244: |
Line 208: |
| development, and completion are partially contingent on the character, | | development, and completion are partially contingent on the character, |
| direction, and end of that very inquiry. | | direction, and end of that very inquiry. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 6
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| The next step to take in preparing a style of phenomenology, that is, | | The next step to take in preparing a style of phenomenology, that is, |
Line 335: |
Line 291: |
| the ultimate reasons for this restriction have to do with the nature | | the ultimate reasons for this restriction have to do with the nature |
| of inquiry and the limited capacities of signs to convey information. | | of inquiry and the limited capacities of signs to convey information. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 7
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| Inquiry into reality has to do with experiential phenomena that recur, | | Inquiry into reality has to do with experiential phenomena that recur, |
Line 364: |
Line 312: |
| states of systems, and ultimately patterned forms of real existence | | states of systems, and ultimately patterned forms of real existence |
| that are able to integrate activity with appearance. | | that are able to integrate activity with appearance. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 8
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations (cont.)
| |
| | | |
| In asking questions about integral patterns of activity and appearance, | | In asking questions about integral patterns of activity and appearance, |
Line 397: |
Line 337: |
| with them, that is, by acquiring and exploiting an acquaintance with | | with them, that is, by acquiring and exploiting an acquaintance with |
| the larger patterns of activity and appearance that apply? | | the larger patterns of activity and appearance that apply? |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 9
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations (concl.)
| |
| | | |
| There is a final question that I have to ask in this preparation for a | | There is a final question that I have to ask in this preparation for a |
Line 457: |
Line 389: |
| they make themselves available for expression in the terms and in the | | they make themselves available for expression in the terms and in the |
| structures of a natural language medium. | | structures of a natural language medium. |
| + | </pre> |
| | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ====3.2.3. A Reflective Heuristic==== |
− | | |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry. Note 10
| |
− | | |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− | | |
− | 3.2.3. A Reflective Heuristic | |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| In a first attempt to state explicitly the principles by which reflection | | In a first attempt to state explicitly the principles by which reflection |
| operates, it helps to notice a few of the tasks that reflection performs. | | operates, it helps to notice a few of the tasks that reflection performs. |
Line 515: |
Line 443: |
| other, is capable of leading in time to forms that subtilize and | | other, is capable of leading in time to forms that subtilize and |
| universalize, at the same time, the forms initially taken by thought. | | universalize, at the same time, the forms initially taken by thought. |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | Inquiry Driven Systems -- Ontology List
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.1. Integrity and Unity of Inquiry
| |
− |
| |
− | 01. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05520.html
| |
− | 02. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05521.html
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations
| |
− |
| |
− | 03. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05522.html
| |
− | 04. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05523.html
| |
− | 05. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05524.html
| |
− | 06. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05525.html
| |
− | 07. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05526.html
| |
− | 08. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05527.html
| |
− | 09. http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05528.html
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
− |
| |
− | Inquiry Driven Systems -- Inquiry List
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2. Reflective Inquiry
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.1. Integrity and Unity of Inquiry
| |
− |
| |
− | 01. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001328.html
| |
− | 02. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001329.html
| |
− |
| |
− | 3.2.2. Apparitions and Allegations
| |
− |
| |
− | 03. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001330.html
| |
− | 04. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001331.html
| |
− | 05. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001332.html
| |
− | 06. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001333.html
| |
− | 07. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001334.html
| |
− | 08. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001335.html
| |
− | 09. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-April/001336.html
| |
− |
| |
− | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| | | |