MyWikiBiz

Changes

Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Wikipaedophilia (view source)

Revision as of 21:43, 22 August 2010

10,708 bytes added ,  21:43, 22 August 2010
→‎More stuff by Kasuga
Line 43: Line 43:     
Yet there are many advocates of this view editing Wikipedia, and you will find it stated or implied in many places. I could give a hundred examples of this from the 'diffs' or edit-differences that are freely available to any member of the public who visits the Wikipedia website.
 
Yet there are many advocates of this view editing Wikipedia, and you will find it stated or implied in many places. I could give a hundred examples of this from the 'diffs' or edit-differences that are freely available to any member of the public who visits the Wikipedia website.
 +
 +
==Manga==
 +
 +
* [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/I love you Wikipi-tan]]
 +
 +
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kasuga]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kasuga[/url] is responsible for these images.
 +
 +
[url=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_by_Kasuga]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_by_Kasuga[/url]
 +
 +
It was he who drew this notorious image
 +
 +
[url=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lolicon_Sample.png]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lolicon_Sample.png[/url]
 +
 +
as being his own work. His deviant art site is here
 +
 +
[url=http://kasuga39.deviantart.com/]http://kasuga39.deviantart.com/[/url]
 +
 +
where one of his pictures got banned for underage nudity.  He does not yet have any products for sale
 +
 +
[url=http://kasuga39.deviantart.com/prints/?utm_source=deviantart&utm_medium=userpage&utm_campaign=printstab]http://kasuga39.deviantart.com/prints/?utm...paign=printstab[/url]
 +
 +
He says here that he draws pornographic comic strips
 +
 +
[url=http://kasuga39.deviantart.com/journal/12617458/#comments]http://kasuga39.deviantart.com/journal/12617458/#comments[/url]
 +
 +
And his website is here
 +
 +
[url=http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/]http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/[/url]
 +
 +
where you can find many images of underage girls drawn in a sexualized way.
 +
 +
[edit] And one of the sites he links to on this page [url=http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/bookmark.html#policy]http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/bookmark.html#policy[/url] is very disturbing.
 +
 +
[url=http://satsuki-yamai.net/top]http://satsuki-yamai.net/top[/url] DOT html  (do not link from work)
 +
[url=http://satsuki-yamai.net/status_doku/index]http://satsuki-yamai.net/status_doku/index[/url] DOT html (probably illegal)
 +
 +
Cartoons of little girls being tortured.  Why is he linking to this?  Why is the artist behind the famous Wikipedia 'Wikipe-tan' linking to websites showing little girls with their genitalia being mutilated, screaming in pain?  Beyond belief.
 +
 +
See also here [url=http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2009Apr#Review_of_File:Lolicon_Sample.png]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...icon_Sample.png[/url] for the usual idiotic discussion about whether the lolicon image was illegal or not.
 +
 +
[quote]It's a ridiculous assertion. First, Kasuga wouldn't have drawn it if it was pornographic. Second, there's no nudity, and no sexual situation portrayed. We have pictures of real naked children on Commons, and have for a long time; this doesn't even come close. Powers (talk) 22:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
[/quote]
 +
 +
[edit]
 +
 +
Another site he links to portrays graphic sexual abuse of minors
 +
 +
[url=http://avonlea.sakura.ne.jp/dojin]http://avonlea.sakura.ne.jp/dojin[/url] DOT htm (almost certainly illegal)
 +
 +
===More stuff by Kasuga===
 +
 +
The artist is Kasuga who drew Wikipetan and whose website has many many pictures of little girls.  He draws them in poses and with clothes suggestive of 11 years old or younger (I mean, girls get out of the 'pink princess' stage by 8 at the most)
 +
 +
*[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/futagohime_07.png], [http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/ppg_04.png],
 +
[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/nadja27.png],
 +
[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/zelda_01.png],
 +
 +
but with contours suggestive of teenagers.
 +
 +
*[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/precure_103.png],
 +
[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/famitan_01.png]
 +
 +
or just blatantly sexualised
 +
 +
*[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/nadja21.png],
 +
[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/gyakusai_2.png],
 +
[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/nadja24.png],
 +
[http://www.geocities.jp/kasuga399/image_oebi/precure_34.png].
    
== Block of Phdarts and Peter Damian ==
 
== Block of Phdarts and Peter Damian ==
Line 141: Line 209:  
* "What is it about the love of boys that bothers you so?" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242013151&oldid=241992653]
 
* "What is it about the love of boys that bothers you so?" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242013151&oldid=241992653]
 
* Reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242016082&oldid=242013151]
 
* Reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242016082&oldid=242013151]
 +
 +
On adding a section to the List of Historical Pederastic Couples, Nandesuka looks at what the sources say, which all say that Montgomery had strong, non-sexual relationships with boys [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242019112&oldid=242016082].  Haiduc replies with "what does sex have to do with it?"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242104971&oldid=242021030], which implies that any man who has a close, non-sexual relationship with an under-aged boy is probably really a pederast. Another editors says that if that's all there is to it, then the list is probably meaningless[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242118711&oldid=242114606]. Haiduc replies by saying that it is irrelevant what editors think pederasty is, which implies that his position is the objective one[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242134631&oldid=242119238].  Squeakbox turns the mirror back towards Haiduc...[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242136118&oldid=242134631].  Haiduc says that he wasn't including himself in his statement and that his position is the "scientific" one [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242158133&oldid=242150170].  Another editor brings up "child-grooming"[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242170536&oldid=242164360]....and this comment is removed by an admin[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=242185862&oldid=242170536].  The same sort of process is currently happening at "Theban Pederasty". I don't see how this can be allowed to continue, one way or the other....
 +
 +
=== More by Haiduc: Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity ===
 +
 +
The Yonge translation
 +
 +
:And Heraclides was so much deceived that he took some passages out of one of his works, and cited them as the words of Sophocles; and Dionysius, when he perceived it, gave him notice of the real truth; and as he would not believe it, and denied it, he sent him word to examine the first letters of the first verses of the book, and they formed the name of Panculus, who was [b]a friend[/b] of Dionysius.  [http://classicpersuasion.org/pw/diogenes/dlheraclides.htm]
 +
 +
As edited by Haiduc:
 +
 +
:And Heraclides was so much deceived that he took some passages out of one of his works, and cited them as the words of Sophocles; and Dionysius, when he perceived it, gave him notice of the real truth; and as he would not believe it, and denied it, he sent him word to examine the first letters of the first verses of the book, and they formed the name of Panculus, who was [b]an eromenos[/b] of Dionysius.."<nowiki><ref></nowiki>THE LIVES AND OPINIONS OF EMINENT PHILOSOPHERS BY DIOGENES LAERTIUS, TRANSLATED BY C.D. YONGE. "LIFE OF HERACLIDES" VII<nowiki></ref></nowiki> [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=199748762&oldid=199744407]
 +
 +
Other miscitations appear to be (but I need to check further): [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244043425&oldid=244042289],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244042289&oldid=244040900],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244040900&oldid=244038744],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244038744&oldid=244037678],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244037678&oldid=244036098],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244036098&oldid=244035911],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244035911&oldid=244032578],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244032578&oldid=244031541],
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pederastic_relationships_in_classical_antiquity&diff=244031541&oldid=244030066]
 +
 +
== VigilancePrime ==
 +
 +
The damning part of the Wikisposure article is where a connection is drawn between [http://www.wikisposure.com/Daniel_Lievre Daniel Lievre], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Daniel_Li%C3%A8vre Wikipedia contributions] who clearly is a very nasty piece of work, and editors on-wiki.  This email e.g.
 +
 +
------------------
 +
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 1:27 AM
 +
From: lievre@hushmail.com
 +
Subject: Fwd: My perma-ban on Wikipedia
 +
Fwd to 9 Wikipedia contacts.
 +
 +
-- Forwarded message from Tlato SMD <tlatosmd@googlemail.com> --
 +
After coming back from a few days of wiki-break to cool off and forgive some people, I find that my modest step back has been thanked by perma-banning me. With you as my only accessible Wikipedia contact right now, it would be great if VigilancePrime, Homologeo, and Bikasuishin could be notified that I've left another comment on my talkpage now that I've come back.
 +
 +
It would also be great if users SSBohio, HolokittyNX, Allstarecho, PeaceNT, and maybe others could be notified of my current unwarranted, humiliating situation.
 +
TlatoSMD
 +
 +
- Daniel Lièvre (lievre@hushmail.com)
 +
Webmaster, Newgon.com.
 +
-----------------------
 +
 +
Clearly directing the named editors to fight against the blocking of the Barry Jameson account [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:El_C&oldid=206007697#Barry_Jameson_block_review]
 +
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Barry_Jameson Jameson contributions]
 +
 +
And here for the record is the correct link to the Jameson block on ANI [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=191533874#Block_review_User:Barry_Jameson]
 +
 +
==Belginusanl==
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Belginusanl Belginusanl]
 +
* [http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:24.192.149.137 Dutch Wikipedia]
 +
 +
==Thje Subject of an article==
 +
 +
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jonathan_King&oldid=307151627#Rule_879:_.27The_subject_of_an_article_shouldn.27t_edit_it_himself.27 Shouldn't edit it themself]
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Oopsie_poopsie Oopsie poopsie]
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Germing Germing]
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joneseyboy2007 Jonesy boy]
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vandalwatcher Vandalwatcher]
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=299791770#Jonathan_King_caught_POV-pushing_his_own_article Jk caught POV pushing his own article]
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/jk1944/Archive Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/jk1944/Archive]
    
== Other pages ==
 
== Other pages ==
    
* [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/The Encyclopedia of Homosexuality]]
 
* [[Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/The Encyclopedia of Homosexuality]]
Ockham
3,209

edits

Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/Special:MobileDiff/70887...123183"