Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| * Digby 24 - Sophisma ''Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit'', Magister Abstractionum. | | * Digby 24 - Sophisma ''Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit'', Magister Abstractionum. |
| * Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning ''Innata est nobis'', probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by [[Boethius of Dacia]], and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the [[Directory:Logic Museum/Oxford condemnations of 1277|condemnations of 1277]]. | | * Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning ''Innata est nobis'', probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by [[Boethius of Dacia]], and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the [[Directory:Logic Museum/Oxford condemnations of 1277|condemnations of 1277]]. |
− | * Digby 204 - [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summulae Dialectices'', [[Thomas Aquinas]] (?), Thomas de Wyck a work on the ''Elenchi'' in the form of a treatise, sometimes influenced by [[Giles of Rome]]. | + | * Digby 204 |
| + | ** [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summulae Dialectices'' |
| + | ** A work by [[Thomas Aquinas]] (?) |
| + | ** Thomas de Wyck a work on the ''Elenchi'' in the form of a treatise, possibly influenced by [[Giles of Rome]]. |
| * Lat misc. e 108 | | * Lat misc. e 108 |
| | | |
| == Corpus Christi == | | == Corpus Christi == |
| | | |
− | * Corpus Christi 119 | + | * Corpus Christi D119 |
| + | ** commentary on ''Perihermenias'' possibly Nicholas of Cornwall |
| + | * Corpus Christi D230 |
| + | **''Exposition of the Isagoge'' Cornibiensis (ff 57r-59v) |
| * Corpus Christi 250 | | * Corpus Christi 250 |
− | * Corpus Christi 293b | + | * Corpus Christi E293B |
| + | ** ''Exposition of the Isagoge'', Nicholas of Cornwall ff 69ra-77va |
| | | |
| == Merton == | | == Merton == |
| | | |
| * Merton 289 | | * Merton 289 |
− | * Merton 292: [[Simon of Faversham]] - ''Perihermenias''. | + | * Merton 292 |
| + | ** [[Simon of Faversham]] - ''Perihermenias''. |
| + | ** Simon, ''Quaestiones super Analytica Priora'' (111r-137v). |
| * Merton 296 | | * Merton 296 |
| | | |
Line 35: |
Line 44: |
| == Peterhouse == | | == Peterhouse == |
| | | |
| + | * Peterhouse 152 Anon., Utrum haec sit vera, 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente, ms. Cambridge (49ra –vb); ed. A. Zimmermann, in 'Eine anonyme Quaestio: 'Utrum haec sit vera 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente', Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 49 (1967), p. 184-8. |
| * Peterhouse 191: [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summa Gramatica'' and [[Robert Kilwardby]]'s Priscian commentary. | | * Peterhouse 191: [[Roger Bacon]]'s ''Summa Gramatica'' and [[Robert Kilwardby]]'s Priscian commentary. |
− | * Peterhouse 205: Questions on the ''Elenchi'' | + | * Peterhouse 205 |
| + | ** Questions on the ''Elenchi'' |
| + | ** Commentary on the [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]] sometimes attributed to Kilwardby. |
| * Peterhouse 206 | | * Peterhouse 206 |
| ** [[Robert Kilwardby]], questions on the [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]]. | | ** [[Robert Kilwardby]], questions on the [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]]. |
Line 43: |
Line 55: |
| | | |
| * Caius 344/540 | | * Caius 344/540 |
− | **[[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian, questions on the ''Perihermenias''. | + | ** [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian (1ra, 19va) |
− | ** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'', questions on the ''Perihermenias''. | + | ** Anon. ''Quaestiones super Physicam'', I-VIII (Caius 344, ff 105rb-170vb) |
| + | ** [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on the ''Perihermenias'' (Lewry quotes 171rb, 189rb) |
| + | ** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'' (inc. 203rb), questions on the ''Perihermenias'' (inc. 210vb, 213rb) |
| + | ** ''Syncategoremata'', attr. Walter Burley (ff 230r-264v). |
| + | ** Johannes de Waefeld, ''Quaestiones super Physicam'', I (Caius 344, ff. 264ra-277vb) |
| * Caius 434/434 | | * Caius 434/434 |
| ** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r). For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19). Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''. | | ** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r). For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19). Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''. |
| * Caius 448/409 | | * Caius 448/409 |
| ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. | | ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. |
| + | ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio librorum Physicorum'' ff. 172-543 |
| * Caius 509/386 | | * Caius 509/386 |
| ** Commentary on [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. | | ** Commentary on [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. |
Line 55: |
Line 72: |
| ** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' | | ** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' |
| ** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. | | ** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. |
| + | ** Guillelmus de Hennore. ''Sophisma'' 'Sola species definitur'. (23vB & 44rA-46rB) |
| * Caius 611/341 | | * Caius 611/341 |
− | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. | + | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. (1r-24v) |
| * Caius 612/543 | | * Caius 612/543 |
| ** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. | | ** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. |
Line 70: |
Line 88: |
| | | |
| * Kk3 | | * Kk3 |
| + | |
| + | == [[Worcester Cathedral Library]] == |
| + | |
| + | * Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5. The manuscript is confidently dated no later than 1295, and probably as early as 1270<ref>Ebbesen 1987, 136 and Lewry 1985</ref> |
| + | ** [[Roger Bacon]] ''Summa grammatica'' (cf Peterhouse 191) (5ra-24vb. |
| + | ** Anon, commentary on ''Analytica Priora'' (165r-191v). |
| + | ** [[Peter of Cornwall]], two ''sophismata''. |
| + | ** Questions on the ''Physica'' |
| + | ** ''Sophisma - nihil est verum nisi in hoc instanti'' - included in a group of ''sophismata'' some of which are ascribed to John of Berwick, master in Oxford c. 1290<ref>Little & Pelster 1934</ref> |
| + | |
| + | == Munich == |
| + | |
| + | * Munich BSB clm. 14383, |
| + | ** Pseudo-Aristoteles ''Secretum secretorum'' (1r-11v) |
| + | ** Hervaeus Natalis ''Quodlibet'' (12r-39v) |
| + | ** Jacob of Metz ''In Sententiarum'' I dist. (40r-63v) |
| + | ** Thomas Aquinas ''Quodlibet III'' (des. mutil.) (64ra-72vb) |
| + | ** Miscellenea medica (73ra-80vb) |
| + | ** Andrew of Cornwall ''Quaestiones super librum Sex principiorum'' (81ra-86ra) |
| + | ** Andrew of Cornwall ''Questiones super librum Porphyrii'' (86rb-92va) |
| + | ** Arwei (Hervaei) ''Tractatus de articulis Durandi (Colophon: ''Explicit de articulis pertinentibus ad primum librum Durandi reprobatis ab arvueo'') |
| + | |
| + | == References == |
| + | |
| + | * A.G. Little & F. Pelster, ''Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302'' Oxford 1934 |
| + | * [[Directory:Logic Museum/Osmund Lewry|Lewry, P.O.]] (ed.), 1985, The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics , Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto. |
| + | * [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Ebbesen, Sten]], 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by [[Peter of Cornwall]], [[Richard de Clive]], [[Simon of Faversham]] and [[Radulphus Brito]],” [[Directory:Logic Museum/CIMAGL|Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin]] 55, Copenhague. |
| + | |
| + | ==Resources== |
| + | |
| + | * [http://www.slu.edu/libraries/vfl/cllctns/descr.html Vatican Film Library] at St Louis University |
| + | * [http://www.vaticanlibrary.va/home.php?ling=eng&pag=dipmanoscritti Vatican library manuscript department] |
| + | * [http://xml.coverpages.org/master.html MASTER] (Manuscript Access through Standards for Electronic Records) is a European Union funded project to create a single on-line catalogue of medieval manuscripts in European libraries. |
| | | |
| == Notes == | | == Notes == |
| {{reflist}} | | {{reflist}} |