Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| !valign = top width=55%| | | !valign = top width=55%| |
| |- valign = top | | |- valign = top |
− | || [139] | + | || [139] Probatio et improbatio patent una cum solutione. Circa istud sophisma primo quaeratur |
− | Probatio et improbatio patent una cum solutione. | |
| | | |
− | Circa istud sophisma primo quaeratur
| |
| * Utrum esse per se dictum possit praedicari de non ente actu, quia si sic tunc posset indifferenter verificari pro entibus et non entibus. | | * Utrum esse per se dictum possit praedicari de non ente actu, quia si sic tunc posset indifferenter verificari pro entibus et non entibus. |
| * 2° utrum non ens possit dici individuum hominis, et hoc est quaerere utrum Caesare non existente Caesar sit homo. | | * 2° utrum non ens possit dici individuum hominis, et hoc est quaerere utrum Caesare non existente Caesar sit homo. |
Line 25: |
Line 23: |
| * Ultimo quaeritur an non posita restrictione possit propositio habere veritatem. | | * Ultimo quaeritur an non posita restrictione possit propositio habere veritatem. |
| || | | || |
− | Concerning this sophism it is asked | + | The proof and disproof are clearly at one with the solution. Concerning this sophism it is asked |
| | | |
| * Whether 'being' predicated ''per se'' could be predicated of an actual non-being. For if so, then it could be verified indifferently for beings and non beings. | | * Whether 'being' predicated ''per se'' could be predicated of an actual non-being. For if so, then it could be verified indifferently for beings and non beings. |
Line 228: |
Line 226: |
| [[Category:Sophismata]] | | [[Category:Sophismata]] |
| [[Category:Scholastic texts]] | | [[Category:Scholastic texts]] |
| + | <div style="overflow:auto;height:1px;"> |
| + | [[Publication Date:=1250?]] |
| + | [[Author:=Peter of Cornwall]] |
| + | </div> |