User talk:Jon Awbrey - Revision history

Happyseaurchin at 15:35, 17 May 2012

2012-05-17T15:35:16Z

Jon Awbrey: /* Logical Graph */

2010-05-22T17:40:41Z

Logical Graph

Jon Awbrey: /* Logical graph */ ok, thanx

2010-05-22T17:40:24Z

Logical graph: ok, thanx

OmniMediaGroup: /* Logical graph */ new section

2010-05-22T17:37:29Z

Logical graph: new section

Jon Awbrey: /* Practical applications? */

2009-04-21T12:20:11Z

Practical applications?

Jon Awbrey: /* Practical applications? */

2009-04-21T12:07:13Z

Practical applications?

Jon Awbrey: /* Practical applications? */

2009-04-21T12:06:15Z

Practical applications?

Wikademia: Practical applications?

2009-04-21T06:33:22Z

Practical applications?

MyWikiBiz: I like the "hyphen hyphen" in the sig field!

2009-01-27T15:50:52Z

I like the "hyphen hyphen" in the sig field!

MyWikiBiz: Defining "theory"

2008-06-18T13:35:38Z

Defining "theory"

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 17 May 2012
Line 235:		Line 235:

	Okay, thanks. [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 17:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		Okay, thanks. [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 17:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== eco^2 ==
		+
		+	Strange trail I seem to be following, from Michel mentioning you, to writing on your p2pwiki page, and now here. I have glanced at your exploration of qualitative calculus which is rather daunting to me -- I feel like a beetle that has landed on an extended cactus drawing. Nevertheless, I'd like to ask you if you could look at modelling the self-similar social contract, [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pqZZ7yh_5KPfi0UShs6-49fOt0-MvqVw5WgZ2WwaRuo/edit mttp], we have discovered with eco^2. Or if you know someone who might be interested in modelling it. Be well! --[[User:Happyseaurchin\|Happyseaurchin]] 15:35, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 22 May 2010
Line 234:		Line 234:
	I've scraped the content of Logical graph on my user page for safe keeping. Let's leave this one alone until Greg can talk to Bill who is overseeing the wiki updates. --[[User:OmniMediaGroup\|OmniMediaGroup]] 17:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)		I've scraped the content of Logical graph on my user page for safe keeping. Let's leave this one alone until Greg can talk to Bill who is overseeing the wiki updates. --[[User:OmniMediaGroup\|OmniMediaGroup]] 17:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

−	Okay, thanks. 17:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)	+	Okay, thanks. [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 17:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 230: / Line 230: @@
 JA: What's most intriguing is that many of Peirce's most far-reaching ideas are contained in his earliest papers, and nowhere near all of them have been applied to the extent that they might be.  [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 05:06, 21 April 2009 (PDT)
-== Logical graph ==
+==Logical Graph==
 I've scraped the content of Logical graph on my user page for safe keeping. Let's leave this one alone until Greg can talk to Bill who is overseeing the wiki updates. --[[User:OmniMediaGroup|OmniMediaGroup]] 17:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 22 May 2010
Line 229:		Line 229:

	JA: What's most intriguing is that many of Peirce's most far-reaching ideas are contained in his earliest papers, and nowhere near all of them have been applied to the extent that they might be. [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 05:06, 21 April 2009 (PDT)		JA: What's most intriguing is that many of Peirce's most far-reaching ideas are contained in his earliest papers, and nowhere near all of them have been applied to the extent that they might be. [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 05:06, 21 April 2009 (PDT)
		+
		+	== Logical graph ==
		+
		+	I've scraped the content of Logical graph on my user page for safe keeping. Let's leave this one alone until Greg can talk to Bill who is overseeing the wiki updates. --[[User:OmniMediaGroup\|OmniMediaGroup]] 17:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 226: / Line 226: @@
 Presuming you realize my question is in good faith and also take the time to answer, thank you for expanding my knowledge base.
-JA: This paper of Peirce's has always interested me because it's the one of the places where the logic of relations, and mathematical logic in general, really begins to take off.  The lion's share of the logical concepts and notations that we actually use today go back to this and other works of Peirce.  As far as nuts-&-bolts applications go, the founding ideas of relational database systems trace through Ted Codd directing back to Peirce's work on the logic of relative terms.
+JA: This paper of Peirce's has always interested me because it's the one of the places where the logic of relations, and mathematical logic in general, really begins to take off.  The lion's share of the logical concepts and notations that we actually use today go back to this and other works of Peirce.  As far as nuts-&-bolts applications go, the founding ideas of relational database systems trace through Ted Codd directly back to Peirce's work on the logic of relative terms.
 JA: What's most intriguing is that many of Peirce's most far-reaching ideas are contained in his earliest papers, and nowhere near all of them have been applied to the extent that they might be.  [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 05:06, 21 April 2009 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 21 April 2009
Line 228:		Line 228:
	JA: This paper of Peirce's has always interested me because it's the one of the places where the logic of relations, and mathematical logic in general, really begins to take off. The lion's share of the logical concepts and notations that we actually use today go back to this and other works of Peirce. As far as nuts-&-bolts applications go, the founding ideas of relational database systems trace through Ted Codd directing back to Peirce's work on the logic of relative terms.		JA: This paper of Peirce's has always interested me because it's the one of the places where the logic of relations, and mathematical logic in general, really begins to take off. The lion's share of the logical concepts and notations that we actually use today go back to this and other works of Peirce. As far as nuts-&-bolts applications go, the founding ideas of relational database systems trace through Ted Codd directing back to Peirce's work on the logic of relative terms.

−	JA: What's most intriguing is that many of Peirce's most far-reaching ideas are contained in his earliest papers, and nowhere near all of them have ~~yet~~ been applied to the extent that they might be. [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 05:06, 21 April 2009 (PDT)	+	JA: What's most intriguing is that many of Peirce's most far-reaching ideas are contained in his earliest papers, and nowhere near all of them have been applied to the extent that they might be. [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 05:06, 21 April 2009 (PDT)

@@ Line 218: / Line 218: @@
 I had to roll you back, Jon.  Sorry.  ;-)  -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 07:50, 27 January 2009 (PST)
-== Practical applications? ==
+==Practical applications?==
 Hello,
@@ Line 225: / Line 225: @@
 Presuming you realize my question is in good faith and also take the time to answer, thank you for expanding my knowledge base.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:33, 21 April 2009
Line 217:		Line 217:

	I had to roll you back, Jon. Sorry. ;-) -- [[User:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz]] 07:50, 27 January 2009 (PST)		I had to roll you back, Jon. Sorry. ;-) -- [[User:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz]] 07:50, 27 January 2009 (PST)
		+
		+	== Practical applications? ==
		+
		+	Hello,
		+
		+	What are/will be the practical applications of [[Directory:Jon_Awbrey/Papers/Peirce's_1870_Logic_Of_Relatives\|this]] paper, and your others?
		+
		+	Presuming you realize my question is in good faith and also take the time to answer, thank you for expanding my knowledge base.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 27 January 2009
Line 213:		Line 213:

	Jon, I just made a wiki(biz)link to the page about [[theory]], only to discover that it hadn't yet been created. Do you think you'd like to [http://www.mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Theory&action=edit give it a try]? It doesn't have to be anything fancy schmantzy -- just include a couple of wikilinks, so that we build a search engine web of authority. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz]] 06:35, 18 June 2008 (PDT)		Jon, I just made a wiki(biz)link to the page about [[theory]], only to discover that it hadn't yet been created. Do you think you'd like to [http://www.mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Theory&action=edit give it a try]? It doesn't have to be anything fancy schmantzy -- just include a couple of wikilinks, so that we build a search engine web of authority. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz]] 06:35, 18 June 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+	== I like the "hyphen hyphen" in the sig field! ==
		+
		+	I had to roll you back, Jon. Sorry. ;-) -- [[User:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz]] 07:50, 27 January 2009 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 18 June 2008
Line 209:		Line 209:

	<font color="crimson" size="7">&hearts;</font> Hey, I really LUV the Johnny Depp ads on my user pages, though! <font color="crimson" size="7">&hearts;</font> [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 08:28, 17 May 2008 (PDT)		<font color="crimson" size="7">&hearts;</font> Hey, I really LUV the Johnny Depp ads on my user pages, though! <font color="crimson" size="7">&hearts;</font> [[User:Jon Awbrey\|Jon Awbrey]] 08:28, 17 May 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+	== Defining "theory" ==
		+
		+	Jon, I just made a wiki(biz)link to the page about [[theory]], only to discover that it hadn't yet been created. Do you think you'd like to [http://www.mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Theory&action=edit give it a try]? It doesn't have to be anything fancy schmantzy -- just include a couple of wikilinks, so that we build a search engine web of authority. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz]] 06:35, 18 June 2008 (PDT)