Help:Editorial Review Board - Revision history

MyWikiBiz: Retiring the ERB

2010-06-07T20:38:03Z

Retiring the ERB

OmniMediaGroup at 19:22, 26 December 2007

2007-12-26T19:22:13Z

OmniMediaGroup: Centiare:Editorial Review Board moved to Help:Editorial Review Board

2007-12-26T19:18:41Z

Centiare:Editorial Review Board moved to Help:Editorial Review Board

Snerfling: /* Certification of winners */

2007-02-10T23:44:28Z

Certification of winners

MyWikiBiz: copyedit

2007-01-18T16:51:01Z

copyedit

Snerfling at 16:46, 18 January 2007

2007-01-18T16:46:04Z

Snerfling at 16:32, 18 January 2007

2007-01-18T16:32:48Z

Centiare: /* Catalog of winners */

2007-01-17T19:14:22Z

Catalog of winners

MyWikiBiz: /* Nomination process */ Don't plagiarize

2007-01-17T18:38:42Z

Nomination process: Don't plagiarize

MyWikiBiz: /* Catalog of winners */ Add NAICS code of article?

2007-01-17T03:40:23Z

Catalog of winners: Add NAICS code of article?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 7 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Help:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''', that is, attributed to the respective copyright holder(s). The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of MyWikiBiz, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary. These three members will serve until the end of 2007~~, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.~~	+	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') was retired after 2007.
−
−	~~==Nomination process==~~
−	The purpose of the ERB is to reward the work of patient, thoughtful contributors who understand the importance and value of adding high-quality, [[Neutral point-of-view]] (NPOV) content to MyWikiBiz, but who wish to see the fruit of their work go undisturbed by other editors.
−
−	~~The Editorial Review Board will look for and expect four important criteria to be filled by nominated pages:~~
−
−	~~# The topic shall be about an entity, action, event, or process that '''does ''not'' have standing in a court of law'''.~~
−	~~# The article shall include multiple relevant, accurate '''reference citations''' to noteworthy publications.~~
−	~~# Any personal conflict of interest or bias of the author shall be deprecated in favor of a '''neutral point-of-view'''.~~
−	~~# Content '''must not plagiarize''' other published works; except that the author(s) of the article may reconstitute their own previous copyrighted material, if they choose.~~
−
−	'''Main Space''' articles meeting these criteria may be nominated by their primary author(s) to the ERB on this project's [[MyWikiBiz_talk:Editorial Review Board\|Discussion page]]. Every weekend, the Board will consider each active nomination and either approve the article as a "winner", return it for additional improvements, or reject it.
−
−	~~==Benefits for winners==~~
−	An article selected for recognition by the ERB will incorporate a [[Relation:Has Contributor\|semantic tag]] to record and relate the work to the pertinent author's '''[[Help:Directory Space\|Directory Space]]''' listing. We hope that this will bring the author(s) the added fame of being contacted by reporters, bloggers, scholars, and other interested parties who wish to learn more about the subject. As with any '''[[Help:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' article, the author is welcome to use [[Directory:Amazon.com/Associates\|Amazon.com Associates]] links to identify their reference sources. No other advertising should be deployed.
−
−	~~==Catalog of winners==~~
−	~~The table below lists the winning articles and authors recognized to date by the ERB:~~
−
−	~~<br>~~
−	~~<ASK Mainlabel="Article" Header="show" Link="all">~~
−	~~[[Has Contributor::+]]~~
−	~~[[Has Contributor::*\|Authors]]~~
−	~~[[NAICS_Code1:=*\|Code]]~~
−	~~</ASK>~~
−	~~<br>~~
−
−	~~==Certification of winners==~~
−	~~[[Image:ERB_Cup.jpg\|thumb\|right\|75px\|The ERB Cup]]~~
−	~~A winning article approved by the ERB will be appended with the image of the '''ERB Cup''' and the following comment:~~
−
−	~~::'''ARTICLE TITLE''' was selected by the [[Directory:MyWikiBiz\|MyWikiBiz]] Editorial Review Board and was written by the following contributor(s):~~
−	~~::* '''AUTHOR(S) NAME(S)'''~~
−
−	~~The ERB Cup image and the above comment should not be used in unauthorized form anywhere else in MyWikiBiz~~.
−
−	~~[[Category:ERB]]~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:Centiare|Centiare's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Centiare:Main Space|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''', that is, attributed to the respective copyright holder(s).  The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of Centiare, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary.  These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.
+The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Help:Main Space|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''', that is, attributed to the respective copyright holder(s).  The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of MyWikiBiz, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary.  These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.
 ==Nomination process==
-The purpose of the ERB is to reward the work of patient, thoughtful contributors who understand the importance and value of adding high-quality, [[Neutral point-of-view]] (NPOV) content to Centiare, but who wish to see the fruit of their work go undisturbed by other editors.
+The purpose of the ERB is to reward the work of patient, thoughtful contributors who understand the importance and value of adding high-quality, [[Neutral point-of-view]] (NPOV) content to MyWikiBiz, but who wish to see the fruit of their work go undisturbed by other editors.
 The Editorial Review Board will look for and expect four important criteria to be filled by nominated pages:
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 # Content '''must not plagiarize''' other published works; except that the author(s) of the article may reconstitute their own previous copyrighted material, if they choose.
-'''Main Space''' articles meeting these criteria may be nominated by their primary author(s) to the ERB on this project's [[Centiare_talk:Editorial Review Board|Discussion page]].  Every weekend, the Board will consider each active nomination and either approve the article as a "winner", return it for additional improvements, or reject it.
+'''Main Space''' articles meeting these criteria may be nominated by their primary author(s) to the ERB on this project's [[MyWikiBiz_talk:Editorial Review Board|Discussion page]].  Every weekend, the Board will consider each active nomination and either approve the article as a "winner", return it for additional improvements, or reject it.
 ==Benefits for winners==
-An article selected for recognition by the ERB will incorporate a [[Relation:Has Contributor|semantic tag]] to record and relate the work to the pertinent author's '''[[Centiare:Directory Space|Directory Space]]'''  listing. We hope that this will bring the author(s) the added fame of being contacted by reporters, bloggers, scholars, and other interested parties who wish to learn more about the subject.  As with any '''[[Centiare:Main Space|Main Space]]''' article, the author is welcome to use [[Directory:Amazon.com/Associates|Amazon.com Associates]] links to identify their reference sources.  No other advertising should be deployed.
+An article selected for recognition by the ERB will incorporate a [[Relation:Has Contributor|semantic tag]] to record and relate the work to the pertinent author's '''[[Help:Directory Space|Directory Space]]'''  listing. We hope that this will bring the author(s) the added fame of being contacted by reporters, bloggers, scholars, and other interested parties who wish to learn more about the subject.  As with any '''[[Help:Main Space|Main Space]]''' article, the author is welcome to use [[Directory:Amazon.com/Associates|Amazon.com Associates]] links to identify their reference sources.  No other advertising should be deployed.
 ==Catalog of winners==
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 A winning article approved by the ERB will be appended with the image of the '''ERB Cup''' and the following comment:
-::'''ARTICLE TITLE''' was selected by the [[Directory:Centiare|Centiare]] Editorial Review Board and was written by the following contributor(s):
+::'''ARTICLE TITLE''' was selected by the [[Directory:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] Editorial Review Board and was written by the following contributor(s):
 ::* '''AUTHOR(S) NAME(S)'''
-The ERB Cup image and the above comment should not be used in unauthorized form anywhere else in Centiare.
+The ERB Cup image and the above comment should not be used in unauthorized form anywhere else in MyWikiBiz.
 [[Category:ERB]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 10 February 2007
Line 35:		Line 35:

	The ERB Cup image and the above comment should not be used in unauthorized form anywhere else in Centiare.		The ERB Cup image and the above comment should not be used in unauthorized form anywhere else in Centiare.
		+
		+	[[Category:ERB]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 18 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:Centiare\|Centiare's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Centiare:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''' ~~i.e.~~, attributed to ~~their~~ respective copyright holder(s). The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of Centiare, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary. These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.	+	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:Centiare\|Centiare's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Centiare:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''', that is, attributed to the respective copyright holder(s). The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of Centiare, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary. These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.

	==Nomination process==		==Nomination process==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 18 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:Centiare\|Centiare's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Centiare:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''' i.e., attributed to their respective ~~contributing author~~(s). The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of Centiare, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary. These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.	+	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:Centiare\|Centiare's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Centiare:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''' i.e., attributed to their respective copyright holder(s). The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of Centiare, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary. These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.

	==Nomination process==		==Nomination process==

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:18, 26 December 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 18 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:Centiare\|Centiare's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Centiare:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' articles are to be protected and attributed to their respective contributing author(s). The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of Centiare, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary. These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.	+	The '''Editorial Review Board''' or ('''ERB''') is [[Directory:Centiare\|Centiare's]] official sanctioning body that determines whether, and which, '''[[Centiare:Main Space\|Main Space]]''' articles are to be '''''protected and promoted''''' i.e., attributed to their respective contributing author(s). The ERB currently consists of the two co-developers of Centiare, plus one additional member who serves as a tie-breaking vote, if necessary. These three members will serve until the end of 2007, after which they hope to be replaced by more credentialed professional editors and/or scholars.

	==Nomination process==		==Nomination process==

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 <br>
-<ASK>
+<ASK Mainlabel="Article" Header="show" Link="all">
 [[Has Contributor::+]]
 [[Has Contributor::*|Authors]]
-[[NAICS_Code1:=*|Article NAICS Code]]
+[[NAICS_Code1:=*|Code]]
 </ASK>
 <br>

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 The purpose of the ERB is to reward the work of patient, thoughtful contributors who understand the importance and value of adding high-quality, [[Neutral point-of-view]] (NPOV) content to Centiare, but who wish to see the fruit of their work go undisturbed by other editors.
-The Editorial Review Board will look for and expect three important criteria to be filled by nominated pages:
+The Editorial Review Board will look for and expect four important criteria to be filled by nominated pages:
 # The topic shall be about an entity, action, event, or process that '''does ''not'' have standing in a court of law'''.
 # The article shall include multiple relevant, accurate '''reference citations''' to noteworthy publications.
 # Any personal conflict of interest or bias of the author shall be deprecated in favor of a '''neutral point-of-view'''.
 '''Main Space''' articles meeting these criteria may be nominated by their primary author(s) to the ERB on this project's [[Centiare_talk:Editorial Review Board|Discussion page]].  Every weekend, the Board will consider each active nomination and either approve the article as a "winner", return it for additional improvements, or reject it.