Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Flying Toaster RfA - Revision history

Ockham at 20:24, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T20:24:44Z

Ockham at 17:31, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T17:31:18Z

Ockham at 17:30, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T17:30:19Z

Ockham at 17:20, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T17:20:31Z

Ockham: New page: {| border=1 cellpadding=10 |- valign = top || [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ars_inveniendi&oldid=254748796 Wikipedia] || [http://www.formalontology.it/mathesis-universalis.htm...

2009-05-21T17:17:55Z

New page: {| border=1 cellpadding=10 |- valign = top || [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ars_inveniendi&oldid=254748796 Wikipedia] || [http://www.formalontology.it/mathesis-universalis.htm...

New page

{| border=1 cellpadding=10
|- valign = top
|| [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ars_inveniendi&oldid=254748796 Wikipedia]
|| [http://www.formalontology.it/mathesis-universalis.htm Source]

|- valign = top
|| [...] a semiotically classified representation of philosophical sciences is a prerequisite to the development of an ars inveniendi.
|| [...] a semiotically classified representation of philosophical sciences is a prerequisite to the development of an ars inveniendi.

|- valign = top
|| Wolff assumes that an isomorphic relationship between concepts and signs as well as between their differences and relations exists and develops a system of concepts resulting in an Organon for philosophy

|| Assuming that an isomorphic relationship between concepts, signs, and things as well as between their differences and relations exists, Wolff develops a system of concepts resulting in a real Organon for philosophy.

|}

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 21 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+
		+	See also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trevor_Williams_(bishop)&oldid=263423877]
		+
	{\| border=1 cellpadding=10		{\| border=1 cellpadding=10
	\|- valign = top		\|- valign = top

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 |- valign = top
-|| Wikipedia
+|| [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ars_inveniendi&oldid=254748796 Wikipedia]
 || [http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/ecopsyc/homeokinetics/discussion/HKphysics.html Source]
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 || A system is a group of relatively common 'atomisms' organized into a high ordered 'atomism' bounded from above and below in the space and time domain.
 |- valign = top
-|| Wikipedia
+|| [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ars_inveniendi&oldid=254748796 Wikipedia]
 || [http://www.homeokinetics.org/ Source]
 |- valign = top

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 || Complex systems are defined by the internal exchange by their actors. In homeokinetics, the goal can be considered an understanding of what these complex internal agents are doing.
 || A complex system is one where there is a tremendous amount of internal exchange by the actors. The physics of complex systems is played out on the basis of trying to understand what these complex internal agents are doing.
 |}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 21 May 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	\|\| Assuming that an isomorphic relationship between concepts, signs, and things as well as between their differences and relations exists, Wolff develops a system of concepts resulting in a real Organon for philosophy.		\|\| Assuming that an isomorphic relationship between concepts, signs, and things as well as between their differences and relations exists, Wolff develops a system of concepts resulting in a real Organon for philosophy.
		+
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| His method follows the ideal of explicating concepts originating in ordinary language, which, because of this origin, become lexicographically applicable, even independently of the theoretical context. […] all content of consciousness is assumed to be accessible to an analysis notionum and to be solely conveyed by signs […]
		+	\|\| Wolff's method follows the ideal of explicating concepts originating in ordinary language, which, because of this origin, become lexicographically applicable, even independently of the theoretical context. [ …] all content of consciousness is assumed to be accessible to an analysis notionum and to be solely conveyed by signs […]
		+
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| Wikipedia
		+	\|\| [http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/ecopsyc/homeokinetics/discussion/HKphysics.html Source]
		+
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| Homeokinetics is the study of complex systems, such as galaxies, social systems, or planetary subsystems.[1]
		+	\|\| Homeokinetics is the study of complex systems, systems such as [..] galaxies, social systems, or various planetary subsystems.
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| Complex systems are divided into atomistic-like units called "atomisms", which exist in a nested hierarchy of systems.
		+	\|\| The entire universe thus consists of atomistic-like units - "atomisms" - bound in interactive ensembles to form systems, level by level in a nested hierarchy of systems.
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| A system is defined as a group of relatively common atomisms which are bounded above and below in the space and time domain.
		+	\|\| A system is a group of relatively common 'atomisms' organized into a high ordered 'atomism' bounded from above and below in the space and time domain.
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| Wikipedia
		+	\|\| [http://www.homeokinetics.org/ Source]
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| Homeokinetics attempts to treat all complex systems equally, animate and inanimate, providing them with a common viewpoint. The complexity involved in learning how these systems work is reduced by the emergence of common languages in all complex systems.
		+	\|\| Homeokinetics treats all complex systems on an equal footing, animate and inanimate, providing them with a common viewpoint. The complexity in studying how they work is reduced by the emergence of common languages in all complex systems.
		+
		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\| Complex systems are defined by the internal exchange by their actors. In homeokinetics, the goal can be considered an understanding of what these complex internal agents are doing.
		+	\|\| A complex system is one where there is a tremendous amount of internal exchange by the actors. The physics of complex systems is played out on the basis of trying to understand what these complex internal agents are doing.

	\|}		\|}