Directory:Philippe Beaudette - Revision history

MyWikiBiz: /* Beaudette's past mistakes */

2013-04-10T19:33:05Z

Beaudette's past mistakes

MyWikiBiz: /* Wiring a project to past employer */ Link to policy

2010-10-18T17:20:15Z

Wiring a project to past employer: Link to policy

MyWikiBiz: /* Wiring a project to past employer */

2010-10-14T20:32:26Z

Wiring a project to past employer

MyWikiBiz: Tidying

2010-10-14T20:31:13Z

Tidying

MyWikiBiz: /* Wiring a project to past employer */

2010-10-14T20:29:02Z

Wiring a project to past employer

MyWikiBiz: /* Wiring a project to past employer */

2010-10-14T20:28:06Z

Wiring a project to past employer

MyWikiBiz: /* Photo gallery */

2010-10-14T20:27:17Z

Photo gallery

MyWikiBiz: /* Photo gallery */ Smile for the camera

2010-10-08T20:43:57Z

Photo gallery: Smile for the camera

MyWikiBiz: More keywords.

2010-01-21T20:55:58Z

More keywords.

MyWikiBiz: /* Beaudette makes mistakes */

2010-01-21T18:57:13Z

Beaudette makes mistakes

@@ Line 131: / Line 131: @@
 Philippe Beaudette's two-step cowardly response:
-::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thekohser2 17:40, 20 January 2010] Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">blocked</font color="red">'''}} Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked)
+::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Thekohser2 17:40, 20 January 2010] Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs) '''<font color="red">blocked</font color="red">''' Thekohser2 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked)
 <br>
-::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&lqt_method=talkpage_history#Background_report_2970 18:03, 20 January 2010]    Critics? Which one(s)?    Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs)    {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">Deleted</font color="red">'''}}     (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))
+::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&lqt_method=talkpage_history#Background_report_2970 18:03, 20 January 2010]    Critics? Which one(s)?    Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs)    '''<font color="red">Deleted</font color="red">'''     (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))
 <br>
 Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation's ''Strategic Planning'' group is an offense that draws censorship and blocking as the only form of response?

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ==Wiring a project to past employer==
-In October 2010, Beaudette was caught in a "[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wired%20deal wired deal]", where a research project was awarded to his former employer, without a competitive request for proposal (RFP) being issued.  This may have been a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation's own policy on purchasing and disbursements.  The news media wrote about [http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikimedia-foundation-wires-biased-study-of-donors this scandal].
+In October 2010, Beaudette was caught in a "[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wired%20deal wired deal]", where a research project was awarded to his former employer, without a competitive request for proposal (RFP) being issued.  This may have been a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation's own [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Purchasing_%26_Disbursements_Procedures policy on purchasing and disbursements].  The news media wrote about [http://www.examiner.com/wiki-edits-in-national/wikimedia-foundation-wires-biased-study-of-donors this scandal].
 Soon after, several Wikimedia volunteers [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-October/061529.html asked] to know [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-October/061534.html more] about the [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-October/061536.html award] of the research contract to '''Q2 Consulting, LLC'''.

@@ Line 119: / Line 119: @@
 <sgardner> (Which means it was not a very, very large amount of money.)<br></blockquote>
-All of the above, just to protect young Philippe Beaudette's mistake of awarding a contract to his former employer, without an iota of competitive bidding.
+All of the above, just to protect young Philippe Beaudette's trying to award a contract to his former employer, without an iota of competitive bidding, without anybody noticing.  Sorry, '''''we noticed'''''!
 ==Beaudette's past mistakes==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ::''The Wikimedia Foundation will continue to geek out on hard drives, bandwidth, and marveling at how many page views they garner. But, they will do nothing to work responsibly and ethically toward building a higher-quality, reliable compendium of human knowledge. Thus driving home the truth that Wikipedia is a massive online role-playing game, not an educational charity project. In a word, fraudulent.''
 ==Photo gallery==
@@ Line 138: / Line 120: @@
 All of the above, just to protect young Philippe Beaudette's mistake of awarding a contract to his former employer, without an iota of competitive bidding.
 <br>
@@ Line 152: / Line 152: @@
 [[Keyword:=Bureaucrat]]
 [[Keyword:=Brown noser]]
 [[Person_First_Name:=Philippe]]
 [[Person_Last_Name:=Beaudette]]
 </div>
 <br>

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 They were told by the Deputy Director of the Wikimedia Foundation to [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2010-October/061551.html stop bothering] the Wikimedia mailing list, and to direct the question to the next Internet Relay Chat session of "Office Hours".
-Here is a partial transcript of that next [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours/Office_hours_2010-10-14 IRC "Office Hours"] session:
+Here is a partial transcript of that next [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours/Office_hours_2010-10-14 IRC "Office Hours"] session, where the guest speaker was WMF Executive Director, Sue Gardner:
 <blockquote>/join #wikimedia-office<br>

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 image:Philippe's_Teeth.jpg
 </gallery>
 <br>

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 image:Philippe_Beaudette_1.jpg
 image:Philippe_Beaudette_2.jpg
 </gallery>

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 <br>
 <div style="overflow:auto;height:1px;">
 [[Keyword:=Coward]]
 [[Keyword:=Sycophant]]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ::*[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation/Feb_2010_Letter_to_the_Board&lqt_method=talkpage_history#Background_report_2970 18:03, 20 January 2010]    Critics? Which one(s)?    Philippe (WMF) (Talk | contribs)    {{Blink|text='''<font color="red">Deleted</font color="red">'''}}     (content was: 'The letter says that "critics" were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project. I'd like to know which one(s) in particular. Considering ho...' (and the only contributor was 'Thekohser2'))
 <br>
-Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation strategy project is a censored and blockable offense?
+Has it really come to the point that simply asking which critic(s) were engaged or interviewed by the Foundation's ''Strategic Planning'' group is an offense that draws censorship and blocking as the only form of response?
-Unable to control his weaselly, sycophantic, and undying support of the Foundation that sustains his livelihood, Beaudette has [http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&limit=100&type=block&user=Philippe+%28WMF%29&month=&year= blocked nearly 100 entities] from participating in the Foundation's strategic planning, rather than letting them engage in dialog as mature adults.  The result?  Pages such as this one that you are reading now.
+Unable to suppress his weaselly, sycophantic, and undying support of the Foundation that sustains his livelihood, Beaudette has [http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&limit=100&type=block&user=Philippe+%28WMF%29&month=&year= blocked nearly 100 entities] from participating in the Foundation's strategic planning process, rather than letting them engage in dialog as mature adults.  The result?  Counter-point pages such as this one that you are reading now.
 ==Photo gallery==