<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Directory%3AMaratreanism%2FCosmodicy</id>
	<title>Directory:Maratreanism/Cosmodicy - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Directory%3AMaratreanism%2FCosmodicy"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Directory:Maratreanism/Cosmodicy&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-26T01:36:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Directory:Maratreanism/Cosmodicy&amp;diff=156482&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Maratrean: This may be copied from elsewhere, but it is entirely my own original work (where it appears elsewhere, I put it there), and as such is not a copyright violation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Directory:Maratreanism/Cosmodicy&amp;diff=156482&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-04-25T06:55:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;This may be copied from elsewhere, but it is entirely my own original work (where it appears elsewhere, I put it there), and as such is not a copyright violation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;'''Cosmodicy''' is the problem for atheists of justifying the fundamental goodness of the universe in the face of evil. It is closely connected with [[theodicy]], which attempts to do this given the existence of God; yet, while many atheists think that by getting rid of God they have got rid of the problem of evil, cosmodicy demonstrates that the problem still exists, it has only assumed a different form. As one author has said &amp;quot;atheists are not supposed to have such thoughts&amp;quot;; and yet they do.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2011/08/15/110815crat_atlarge_wood#ixzz1Ut5ikoYb James Wood, &amp;quot;Secularism and its discontents: Is That All There Is?&amp;quot;, ''The New Yorker'', August 15, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of theologians have grappled with the relationship between cosmodicy and theodicy. Johannes van der Ven argues that the choice between theodicy and cosmodicy is a false dilemma.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see van der Ven, J.A. “Theodicy or cosmodicy: a false dilemma?”, ''Journal of Empirical Theology'', Volume 2, Number 1, 1989 , pp. 5-27(23); see also Johannes A. van der Ven, ''God reinvented?: a theological search in texts and tables'', Empirical studies in theology, Vol. 1, Leiden [u.a.] Brill 1998, p. 205&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Philip E. Devenish proposes &amp;quot;a nuanced view in which theodicy and cosmodicy are rendered complementary, rather than alternative concepts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Devenish, Philip E. “Theodicy and Cosmodicy: The Contribution of Neoclassical Theism”, Journal of Empirical Theology 4 (1992): 5-23&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cosmodicy is a major theme in the philosophy of [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ul.ie/~philos/vol10/Logos.html Mark Balto, “Logos As Will And Cosmodicy”], ''Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy'' Vol. 10 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]][[Category:Theology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Maratrean</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>