Directory:Logic Museum/Ockham/Summa Logicae I 1-7 - Revision history

Ockham: Removing all content from page

2010-02-14T17:04:57Z

Removing all content from page

Ockham at 16:51, 14 February 2010

2010-02-14T16:51:34Z

Ockham at 16:28, 14 February 2010

2010-02-14T16:28:25Z

Ockham at 15:40, 14 February 2010

2010-02-14T15:40:35Z

Ockham at 15:37, 14 February 2010

2010-02-14T15:37:39Z

Ockham at 15:37, 14 February 2010

2010-02-14T15:37:06Z

Ockham: New page: Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts

2010-02-14T15:31:54Z

New page: Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts

New page

[[Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 14 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~[[Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts]]~~

−
−	~~{\| border=1 cellpadding=10~~
−	~~!valign = top width=46%\|Latin~~
−	~~!valign = top width=54%\|English~~
−
−
−	~~\|- valign = top~~
−	~~\|\|'''Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI'''~~
−	~~\|\| Part I, chapter 1. Of the definition of the term and of its division in general~~
−	~~\|- valign = top~~
−
−	\|\| (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse".
−
−	\|\| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or disjoined, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
−	\|}

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 || (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse".
-|| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms.  Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition.  For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
+|| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms.  Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition.  For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or disjoined, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
 |}

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 || (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse".
-|| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms.  Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition.  For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
+|| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms.  Thus a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition.  For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
 |}

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 {| border=1 cellpadding=10
 !valign = top width=46%|Latin
-!valign = top width=54%|Latin
+!valign = top width=54%|English
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 |- valign = top
-|| (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in
+|| (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse".
 || All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms.  Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition.  For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
 |}

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse".
-|| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms.  Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition.  For, defining a term in Prior Analytics I, Aristotle says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
+|| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms.  Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition.  For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
 |}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 14 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts]]
		+
		+
		+	{\| border=1 cellpadding=10
		+	!valign = top width=46%\|Latin
		+	!valign = top width=54%\|Latin
		+

		+	\|- valign = top
		+	\|\|'''Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI'''
		+	\|\| Part I, chapter 1. Of the definition of the term and of its division in general
		+	\|- valign = top

−	[[~~Category:Logic Museum Parallel Texts]~~]	+	\|\| (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in
		+	quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse".
		+
		+	\|\| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in Prior Analytics I, Aristotle says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not.
		+	\|}