Directory:Jon Awbrey/Projects/Peircean Pragmata - Revision history

Jon Awbrey: update + waybak links

2017-08-26T20:36:09Z

update + waybak links

Jon Awbrey: update + waybak links

2017-08-25T13:50:39Z

update + waybak links

Show changes

Jon Awbrey: update

2017-08-21T21:44:05Z

update

Show changes

Jon Awbrey: '''Author: Jon Awbrey'''

2013-10-02T21:00:04Z

'''Author: Jon Awbrey'''

Jon Awbrey: /* Pragmatic Maxim as Closure Principle */ sub[k-variable function/k-adic function]

2012-12-25T19:32:08Z

Pragmatic Maxim as Closure Principle: sub[k-variable function/k-adic function]

Jon Awbrey: cleanup obsolete tags & templates

2010-12-06T14:44:52Z

cleanup obsolete tags & templates

Jon Awbrey: single space after period in headings

2009-03-04T18:46:56Z

single space after period in headings

Show changes

Jon Awbrey: /* Pieces of the Puzzle */ + memo [Pragmatic Maxim as Representation Principle]

2008-11-18T19:44:19Z

Pieces of the Puzzle: + memo [Pragmatic Maxim as Representation Principle]

Jon Awbrey: /* Excerpt 14. Peirce (CE 1, 168–169) */ polytonic doesn't seem to work consistently

2008-11-15T17:20:21Z

Excerpt 14. Peirce (CE 1, 168–169): polytonic doesn't seem to work consistently

Jon Awbrey: /* Anamnesis */ trim

2008-11-15T14:28:42Z

Anamnesis: trim

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 __TOC__
 ==Pieces of the Puzzle==
@@ Line 853: / Line 835: @@
 <p>Charles Sanders Peirce, &ldquo;Harvard Lectures ''On the Logic of Science''&rdquo; (1865), ''Writings of Charles S. Peirce : A Chronological Edition, Volume&nbsp;1, 1857&ndash;1866'', Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1982.</p>
-==Resources==
+==References==
 * [http://www.iupui.edu/~peirce/writings/v2/w2/w2_06/v2_06.htm Peirce, C.S. (13 Nov 1867), "Upon Logical Comprehension and Extension"].
 * [http://www.unav.es/gep/SeminariodeTienne.html De Tienne, André (28 Sep 2006), "Peirce's Logic of Information"].
 ==Document History==
@@ Line 918: / Line 920: @@
 ====2004 &bull; Inquiry List &bull; Determination====
-* http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/thread.html#2197
+* http://web.archive.org/web/20150224134418/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/thread.html#2197
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002197.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014003634/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002197.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002198.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004747/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002198.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002199.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004144/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002199.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002200.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004431/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002200.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002201.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014003714/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002201.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002202.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014003948/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002202.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002203.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004131/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002203.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002204.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004846/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002204.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002205.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014003940/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002205.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002206.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20150224134000/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002206.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002207.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20150224134020/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002207.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002208.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20150224134043/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002208.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002209.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20150224134101/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002209.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002210.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004329/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002210.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002211.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004345/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002211.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002212.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004513/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002212.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002213.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004733/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002213.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002214.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004006/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002214.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002215.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004534/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002215.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002216.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004032/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002216.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002217.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004306/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002217.html
-# http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002218.html
+# http://web.archive.org/web/20061014004446/http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-December/002218.html
 ===INF. Inquiry Into Information===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{DISPLAYTITLE:Project : Peircean Pragmata}}
 ==Anamnesis==
@@ Line 916: / Line 918: @@
 *[http://www.unav.es/gep/SeminariodeTienne.html De Tienne, André (28 Sep 2006), "Peirce's Logic of Information"].

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 : <math>C(x) = C(C(x))\!</math>
-It is tempting to try and read the pragmatic maxim as if it had the following form, where <math>C\!</math> and <math>E\!</math> are supposed to be a 1-adic functions for "concept of" and "effects of", respectively.
+It is tempting to try and read the pragmatic maxim as if it had the following form, where <math>C\!</math> and <math>E\!</math> are supposed to be a 1-variable functions for &ldquo;concept of&rdquo; and &ldquo;effects of&rdquo;, respectively.
-: 1-adic functional case:
+: 1-variable function case:
 : <math>C(x) = C(E(x))\!</math>
@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 But it is really more like:
-: 2-adic functional case:
+: 2-variable function case:
 : <math>C(y, x) = C(y, E(y, x))\!</math>
@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 It is also very likely that the functional interpretations will not do the trick, and that 3-adic relations will need to be used instead.
-'''Source.'''  [http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/suo/ontology/msg04316.html Jon Awbrey (08 Aug 2002), "Inquiry Driven Systems : Note 23", Ontology List, Peirce List].
+'''Source.'''  [http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/suo/ontology/msg04316.html Jon Awbrey (08 Aug 2002), Inquiry Driven Systems : Note 23, Ontology List, Peirce List].
 ===Pragmatic Maxim as Representation Principle===

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 6 December 2010
Line 917:		Line 917:
	*[http://www.unav.es/gep/SeminariodeTienne.html De Tienne, André (28 Sep 2006), "Peirce's Logic of Information"].		*[http://www.unav.es/gep/SeminariodeTienne.html De Tienne, André (28 Sep 2006), "Peirce's Logic of Information"].

−	~~{{aficionados}}~~<sharethis />	+	<br><sharethis />
−
−	~~<!--semantic tags-->~~
−	~~[[Common Name:=Peircean Pragmata\| ]]~~
−	~~[[Project Name:=Peircean Pragmata\| ]]~~
−	~~[[Project Of::Directory:Jon Awbrey\| ]]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 18 November 2008
Line 91:		Line 91:

	'''Source.''' [http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/suo/ontology/msg04316.html Jon Awbrey (08 Aug 2002), "Inquiry Driven Systems : Note 23", Ontology List, Peirce List].		'''Source.''' [http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/suo/ontology/msg04316.html Jon Awbrey (08 Aug 2002), "Inquiry Driven Systems : Note 23", Ontology List, Peirce List].
		+
		+	===Pragmatic Maxim as Representation Principle===
		+
		+	''Read My Ellipsis …''

	==Determination==		==Determination==

@@ Line 288: / Line 288: @@
 <p>In the second place, it is a determination of our own soul, it is ''our'' experience;  we feel that it is so because it lasts in time.  Were it a flash of sensation, there for less than an instant, and then utterly gone from memory, we should not have time to think it ours.  But while it lasts, and we reflect upon it, it enters into the internal world.</p>
-<p>We have now considered that experience as a determination of the modifying object and of the modified soul;  now, I say, it may be and is naturally regarded as also a determination of an idea of the Universal mind;  a preëxistent, archetypal Idea.  Arithmetic, the law of number, ''was'' before anything to be numbered or any mind to number had been created.  It ''was'' though it did not ''exist''.  It was not ''a fact'' nor a thought, but it was an unuttered word.   Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος.  We feel an experience to be a determination of such an archetypal <font size="2">L</font><font size="1">OGOS</font>, by virtue of its //&nbsp;''depth of tone'' / logical intension&nbsp;//, and thereby it is in the ''logical world''.</p>
+<p>We have now considered that experience as a determination of the modifying object and of the modified soul;  now, I say, it may be and is naturally regarded as also a determination of an idea of the Universal mind;  a preëxistent, archetypal Idea.  Arithmetic, the law of number, ''was'' before anything to be numbered or any mind to number had been created.  It ''was'' though it did not ''exist''.  It was not ''a fact'' nor a thought, but it was an unuttered word.  Εν αρχη ην ο λόγος.  We feel an experience to be a determination of such an archetypal <font size="2">L</font><font size="1">OGOS</font>, by virtue of its //&nbsp;''depth of tone'' / logical intension&nbsp;//, and thereby it is in the ''logical world''.</p>
 <p>Note the great difference between this view and Hegel's.  Hegel says, logic is the science of the pure idea.  I should describe it as the science of the laws of experience in virtue of its being a determination of the idea, or in other words as the formal science of the logical world.</p>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Anamnesis==
-A number of recent postings on blogs and discussion lists have brought to mind a congeries of perennial themes out of Peirce.  I am prompted to collect what old notes of mine I can glean off the Web, and &mdash; The Horror!  The Horror! &mdash; maybe even plumb the verdimmerung depths of that old box of papyrus under the desk&nbsp;&hellip;
+Recent postings on blogs and discussion lists have brought to mind a congeries of perennial themes out of Peirce.  I am prompted to collect what old notes of mine I can glean off the Web, and &mdash; The Horror!  The Horror! &mdash; maybe even plumb the verdimmerung depths of that old box of papyrus under the desk&nbsp;&hellip;
 __TOC__