<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://mywikibiz.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jayzel</id>
	<title>MyWikiBiz - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://mywikibiz.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Jayzel"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mywikibiz.com/Special:Contributions/Jayzel"/>
	<updated>2026-06-13T03:23:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Talk:Wikipedia_scandals&amp;diff=12764</id>
		<title>Talk:Wikipedia scandals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Talk:Wikipedia_scandals&amp;diff=12764"/>
		<updated>2007-03-21T07:46:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jayzel: /* Fuzzy Zoeller incident */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;That's a great chart! It would be cool if a major media property elected to use it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fuzzy Zoeller incident ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arg! I didn't even include the February 22nd revelation that Fuzzy Zoeller was bringing a lawsuit against an editor who libeled Zoeller in Wikipedia.  Maybe I can update the page at some point, and extend the financial pattern backwards a couple of weeks, to include the Microsoft blogger incident, too.  For now, though, I think the graphic speaks volumes. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 08:57, 19 March 2007 (PDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be a lot more convincing if you pushed the starting date back a month. For all we can tell, the first day just happened to coincide with a major donation and was a spike. [[User:Jayzel|Jayzel]] 00:46, 21 March 2007 (PDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jayzel</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>