Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Ockham/Summa Logicae I 1-7"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 24, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{| border=1 cellpadding=10 | {| border=1 cellpadding=10 | ||
!valign = top width=46%|Latin | !valign = top width=46%|Latin | ||
| − | !valign = top width=54%| | + | !valign = top width=54%|English |
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|- valign = top | |- valign = top | ||
| − | || (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in | + | || (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse". |
| − | quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse". | ||
|| All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not. | || All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in ''[[Prior Analytics]]'' I, [[Aristotle]] says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 15:40, 14 February 2010
| Latin | English
|
|---|---|
| Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI | Part I, chapter 1. Of the definition of the term and of its division in general |
| (i) Omnes logicae tractatores intendunt astruere quod argumenta ex propositionibus et propositiones ex terminis componuntur. Unde terminus aliud non est quam pars propinqua propositionis. Definiens enim terminum Aristoteles, I Priorum, dicit: "Terminum voco in quem resolvitur propositio, ut praedicatum et de quo praedicatur, vel apposito vel diviso esse vel non esse". | All those who treat logic try to show that arguments are put together out of propositions and propositions out of terms. Whence a term is nothing else but a proximate part of a proposition. For, defining a term in Prior Analytics I, Aristotle says "I call a term [that] into which a proposition is resolved, i.e. the predicate and that of which it is predicated, either by what is conjoined or divided, [expressing] what is the case or is not. |
