Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Peter Damian Evidence"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 24, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: '''Evidence for the Arbitration Committee''' == The Arbitration Committee (September 2008) == == Peter Damian Background == === Work in progress === * Ontological argument * [[Seco...)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
=== Work in progress ===
 
=== Work in progress ===
  
* [[Ontological argument]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological argument]
* [[Second scholasticism]] new article.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second scholasticism] new article.
* [[Talk:Philosophy/Definition]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Philosophy/Definition]
* [[Paul Engelmann]] - new article
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul Engelmann] - new article
* [[Stonborough House]] - new article
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonborough House] - new article
  
 
=== Mathematics, logic and set theory ===
 
=== Mathematics, logic and set theory ===
  
* [[Zermelo_set_theory]] Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Zermelo_set_theory 662] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo_set_theory] Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Zermelo_set_theory 662] times in February 2008.
* [[Skolem%27s_paradox]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skolem%27s_paradox]
* [[Hume%27s_principle]]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Hume%27s_principle 1012] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hume%27s_principle]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Hume%27s_principle 1012] times in February 2008.
* [[Definitions_of_Logic]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_Logic]
* [[Logical_form]]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Logical_form 450] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_form]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Logical_form 450] times in February 2008.
  
 
=== Philosophical Logic ===
 
=== Philosophical Logic ===
  
* [[Concept_and_object]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept_and_object]
* [[Unity_of_the_proposition]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unity_of_the_proposition]
* [[Proper_name]]  
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_name]  
* [[Existence]] (since rather spoilt) - viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Existence 13994] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence] (since rather spoilt) - viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Existence 13994] times in February 2008.
* [[Russell%27s_paradox]] (since rather spoilt)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox] (since rather spoilt)
* [[Connotation_and_denotation]] (now considerably spoilt)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connotation_and_denotation] (now considerably spoilt)
* [[Sense_and_reference]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_and_reference]
* [[Empty_name]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_name]
* [[Philosophical_logic]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_logic]
* [[Plural_quantification]] viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Plural_quantification 260] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural_quantification] viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Plural_quantification 260] times in February 2008.
* [[Ontological_commitment]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_commitment]
* [[Definition]] viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Definition 139877] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition] viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Definition 139877] times in February 2008.
* [[Singular_term]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_term]
  
I suppose I should mention [[Philosophy]] ([http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Philosophy 138105] in February 2008) as I did put some time into it, but it really has got f--ked up now.  The current breed of admins are good at picking up minor schoolboy vandalism but are incapable of spotting anything that requires expert knowledge.  That is the problem with Wikipedia isn't it.  [[edward]] 16:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
+
I suppose I should mention [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy Philosophy] ([http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Philosophy 138105] in February 2008) as I did put some time into it, but it really has got f--ked up now.  The current breed of admins are good at picking up minor schoolboy vandalism but are incapable of spotting anything that requires expert knowledge.  That is the problem with Wikipedia isn't it.  [[edward]] 16:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
  
 
=== Medieval philosophy and logic ===
 
=== Medieval philosophy and logic ===
  
* [[Square_of_opposition]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_of_opposition]
* [[Medieval_philosophy]]  Medieval philosophy (incomplete, I am not allowed to finish this - viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Medieval_philosophy 6460] times in February 2008
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_philosophy]  Medieval philosophy (incomplete, I am not allowed to finish this - viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Medieval_philosophy 6460] times in February 2008
* [[Term_logic]] (since much tampered with)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_logic] (since much tampered with)
* [[Continuity_thesis]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_thesis]
* [[Sum_of_Logic]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sum_of_Logic]
* [[Scholasticism]]  [Correction: Scholasticism is not just a method, but also a ''system'' of theology and philosophy, and a ''movement'', possibily even a ''doctrine''].  [http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/scholast.htm useful]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism]  [Correction: Scholasticism is not just a method, but also a ''system'' of theology and philosophy, and a ''movement'', possibily even a ''doctrine''].  [http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/scholast.htm useful]
* [[Medieval philosophy]] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Medieval_philosophy Views] (Tidy up after well-meaning but destructive edits made during my exile)  
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval philosophy] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Medieval_philosophy Views] (Tidy up after well-meaning but destructive edits made during my exile)  
* [[Duns Scotus]] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Duns_Scotus Views] (needs much work)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duns Scotus] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Duns_Scotus Views] (needs much work)
* [[Jacopo Zabarella]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacopo Zabarella]
* [[Walter Burley]] (just a stub right now)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter Burley] (just a stub right now)
* [[William of Ockham]] (major clean up required for this the greatest of English logicians and philosophers)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William of Ockham] (major clean up required for this the greatest of English logicians and philosophers)
* [[Peter Damian]] (add some of his more idiosyncratic pronouncements)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter Damian] (add some of his more idiosyncratic pronouncements)
* [[Isagoge]] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Isagoge Views]  (new article, tidy up)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isagoge] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Isagoge Views]  (new article, tidy up)
* [[Formal distinction]] new article.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal distinction] new article.
* [[Henry of Ghent]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry of Ghent]
  
 
=== Classical Philosophy ===
 
=== Classical Philosophy ===
  
* [[Metaphysics_%28Aristotle%29]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics_%28Aristotle%29 Aristotle's Metaphysics]
* [[Philosophy]] - the usual old nonsense.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy Philosophy]
* [[Posterior_Analytics]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterior_Analytics Aristotle's Posterior Analytics]
* [[Categories_%28Aristotle%29]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categories_%28Aristotle%29 Aristotle's Categories]
 +
* Don't forget the Perihermenias
 
   
 
   
  
 
=== Biographies ===
 
=== Biographies ===
  
* [[Peter_Auriol]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Auriol Peter Auriol]
* [[William_of_Sherwood]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_of_Sherwood William of Sherwood]
* [[Ernst_Schr%C3%B6der]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Schr%C3%B6der Ernst Schroder]
* [[Peter_Geach]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Geach Peter Geach]
* [[Crispin_Wright]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crispin_Wright Crispin Wright]
* [[Anthony_Kenny]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Kenny Anthony Kenny]
* [[Max_Black]]  (sadly the picture that Black's son sent me has been deleted, not sure why)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Black Max Black]  (sadly the picture that Black's son sent me has been deleted, not sure why)
* [[Simon_of_Faversham]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_of_Faversham Simon of Faversham]
* [[Jonathan_Lowe]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Lowe Jonathan Lowe]
* [[Arthur_Prior]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Prior Arthur Prior]
  
 
=== Gospel music ===
 
=== Gospel music ===
  
* [[Mitchell%27s_Christian_Singers]]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell%27s_Christian_Singers Mitchell's Christian Singers]
 
 
  
 
== Argument ==
 
== Argument ==

Revision as of 07:11, 19 September 2008

Evidence for the Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee (September 2008)

Peter Damian Background

Work in progress

Mathematics, logic and set theory

  • [2] Viewed 662 times in February 2008.
  • [3]
  • [4] Viewed 1012 times in February 2008.
  • [5]
  • [6] Viewed 450 times in February 2008.

Philosophical Logic

I suppose I should mention [Philosophy (138105 in February 2008) as I did put some time into it, but it really has got f--ked up now. The current breed of admins are good at picking up minor schoolboy vandalism but are incapable of spotting anything that requires expert knowledge. That is the problem with Wikipedia isn't it. edward 16:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Medieval philosophy and logic

  • [20]
  • [21] Medieval philosophy (incomplete, I am not allowed to finish this - viewed 6460 times in February 2008
  • [22] (since much tampered with)
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25] [Correction: Scholasticism is not just a method, but also a system of theology and philosophy, and a movement, possibily even a doctrine]. useful
  • philosophy Views (Tidy up after well-meaning but destructive edits made during my exile)
  • Scotus Views (needs much work)
  • Zabarella
  • Burley (just a stub right now)
  • of Ockham (major clean up required for this the greatest of English logicians and philosophers)
  • Damian (add some of his more idiosyncratic pronouncements)
  • [26] Views (new article, tidy up)
  • distinction new article.
  • of Ghent

Classical Philosophy


Biographies

Gospel music

Argument

  • There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
  • My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.

To justify this I will need to explain exactly why I have a problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.

Blocks of Peter Damian

Relevant accounts

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=19188 December block

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peter_Damian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hinnibilis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Renamed user 4

Blocks

Damian blocks Renamed user 4 blocks

  • 4 December 2007 Radiant! (Smear campaign)
  • 6 December 2007 WJBscribe (legal threat)
  • 29 June 2008 Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)
  • 13 August 2008 (MBiszanz - personal attack or harassment)
  • 01:45, 31 August 2008 bu Coren (incivility)
  • 23:11, 6 September 2008 by Jimbo Wales (harassment)

Criticism of FT2