Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Peter Damian Evidence"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday May 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 104: Line 104:
 
* (Minor premiss) My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
 
* (Minor premiss) My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith.  My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.
  
−
The major premiss is clear.  Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project.  To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and [[#Criticism of FT2 | criticise]] some of FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project, and the [[#Blocks of Peter Damian | blocks]] of Peter Damian connected with this.
+
The major premiss is clear.  Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project.  To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and [[#Criticism of FT2 | criticise]] some of FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project, and to see how the [[#Blocks of Peter Damian | blocks of Peter Damian]] are connected with this.
  
 
== Criticism of FT2 ==
 
== Criticism of FT2 ==

Revision as of 10:32, 19 September 2008

Evidence for the Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee (September 2008)

Peter Damian Background

Mathematics, logic and set theory

Philosophy and Logic

Medieval philosophy and logic

Aristotle

Biographies

Gospel music

Architecture

Argument

My argument for unblocking is very simple, as follows.


  • (Major premiss) There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
  • (Minor premiss) My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.

The major premiss is clear. Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project. To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and criticise some of FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project, and to see how the blocks of Peter Damian are connected with this.

Criticism of FT2

Blocks of Peter Damian

Relevant accounts

Block logs

Relevant Blocks

  • 4 December 2007 Radiant! (Smear campaign)
  • 6 December 2007 WJBscribe (legal threat)
  • 29 June 2008 Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)
  • 13 August 2008 (MBisanz - personal attack or harassment)
  • 01:45, 31 August 2008 by Coren (incivility)
  • 23:11, 6 September 2008 by Jimbo Wales (harassment)

4 December 2007

6 December 2007

WJBscribe (legal threat)

29 June 2008

Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)

13 August 2008

(MBiszanz - personal attack or harassment)

31 August 2008

by Coren (incivility)

6 September 2008

  • by Jimbo Wales (harassment)
Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Directory:The_Wikipedia_Point_of_View/Peter_Damian_Evidence&oldid=70596"