Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Peter Damian Evidence"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday May 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
=== Medieval philosophy and logic ===
 
=== Medieval philosophy and logic ===
  
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_of_opposition]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_of_opposition Square of opposition]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_philosophyMedieval philosophy (incomplete, I am not allowed to finish this - viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Medieval_philosophy 6460] times in February 2008
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_philosophy Medieval philosophy]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Medieval_philosophy 6460] times in February 2008
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_logic] (since much tampered with)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_logic Term logic] (since much tampered with)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_thesis]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_thesis Continuity thesis]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sum_of_Logic]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sum_of_Logic Ockham's Summa Logicae]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism]  [Correction: Scholasticism is not just a method, but also a ''system'' of theology and philosophy, and a ''movement'', possibily even a ''doctrine''].  [http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/scholast.htm useful]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism Scholasticism]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval philosophy] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Medieval_philosophy Views] (Tidy up after well-meaning but destructive edits made during my exile)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duns_Scotus Duns Scotus] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Duns_Scotus Views] (needs much work)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duns Scotus] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Duns_Scotus Views] (needs much work)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacopo_Zabarella Jacopo Zabarella]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacopo Zabarella]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Burley Walter Burley] (just a stub right now)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter Burley] (just a stub right now)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_of_Ockham William of Ockham] (major clean up required for this the greatest of English logicians and philosophers)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William of Ockham] (major clean up required for this the greatest of English logicians and philosophers)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Damian Peter Damian] (add some of his more idiosyncratic pronouncements)
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter Damian] (add some of his more idiosyncratic pronouncements)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isagoge Isagoge] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Isagoge Views]  
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isagoge] [http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Isagoge Views] (new article, tidy up)
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_distinction Formal distinction] new article.
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal distinction] new article.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_of_Ghent Henry of Ghent]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry of Ghent]
 
  
 
=== Classical Philosophy ===
 
=== Classical Philosophy ===

Revision as of 07:14, 19 September 2008

Evidence for the Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee (September 2008)

Peter Damian Background

Work in progress

Mathematics, logic and set theory

  • [2] Viewed 662 times in February 2008.
  • [3]
  • [4] Viewed 1012 times in February 2008.
  • [5]
  • [6] Viewed 450 times in February 2008.

Philosophical Logic

I suppose I should mention [Philosophy (138105 in February 2008) as I did put some time into it, but it really has got f--ked up now. The current breed of admins are good at picking up minor schoolboy vandalism but are incapable of spotting anything that requires expert knowledge. That is the problem with Wikipedia isn't it. edward 16:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Medieval philosophy and logic

Classical Philosophy


Biographies

Gospel music

Argument

  • There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
  • My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.

To justify this I will need to explain exactly why I have a problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.

Blocks of Peter Damian

Relevant accounts

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=19188 December block

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Peter_Damian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hinnibilis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Renamed user 4

Blocks

Damian blocks Renamed user 4 blocks

  • 4 December 2007 Radiant! (Smear campaign)
  • 6 December 2007 WJBscribe (legal threat)
  • 29 June 2008 Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)
  • 13 August 2008 (MBiszanz - personal attack or harassment)
  • 01:45, 31 August 2008 bu Coren (incivility)
  • 23:11, 6 September 2008 by Jimbo Wales (harassment)

Criticism of FT2